have long been victims of political empiricism, victims of give us the rulers who want to achieve more success in their careers. How selfish! Some will think.
policy position is defended by the Sophist Protagoras was harshly criticized by Plato. How will you be good what the people think if they have not even brought to trial or moral sense? There is a clear difference between what is well done, and what we do.
So what do we do what the populace is very happy? A difficult question. What is right, all right, even the people to strive to think / believe the contrary, and this happened in the Athens of Plato and today. It's easy to look good and have people unhappy. But answers to the question is: you can force people to accept the government's decision, although a priori this does not seem too moderate and slightly overbearing, if government decisions were good no one will accept a good thing should cost ... is it?
Alberto Aguilar Narbonne - Activity: Relates to bowl with the thought of another philosopher
0 comments:
Post a Comment